DeepSeek Flash (4.1) vs Grok 4.7
DeepSeek Flash (4.1) scores higher on the Models at Work leaderboard (70 vs 58 out of 100). DeepSeek Flash (4.1) is about 7.1× cheaper per blended million tokens ($0.52 vs $3.74, one figure an Artificial Analysis estimate).
| DeepSeek Flash (4.1) · DeepSeek | Grok 4.7 · xAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Leaderboard rank | #9 | #12 |
| Score (0–100) | 70 | 58 |
| Tier | Fast and cheap | Workhorse |
| Price per 1M tokens | $0.30 in · $1.20 out | $3.74 blended (estimate) |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Open weights | Not verified | No |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | — | 46 |
| Best for | Cheap coding tiers, Bulk generation, Experiments where data residency is not a constraint | X-integrated products |
Choose DeepSeek Flash (4.1) if…
- you need cheap coding tiers
- you need bulk generation
- you need experiments where data residency is not a constraint
The reason a thousand people argued on Hacker News this week: frontier-adjacent coding for pocket change, with the caveats you would expect.
Caveats: Open-weights status and licence not verified from a primary source at time of writing. Off-peak and peak pricing differ; the cheap numbers are off-peak. Data handling terms should be read before any enterprise use.
Choose Grok 4.7 if…
- you need x-integrated products
Mid-table on the index at a frontier price, with a smaller context window than everyone above it.
Caveats: 500K context is the smallest in the table. Listed by Artificial Analysis under the creator's current corporate name.
What practitioners say
DeepSeek Flash (4.1): The 'why isn't the industry freaking out' post hit 1,067 points; the most-upvoted replies say the price is real and the coding gap to Opus is also real.
Questions people ask
Which is better, DeepSeek Flash (4.1) or Grok 4.7?
DeepSeek Flash (4.1) scores higher on the Models at Work leaderboard (70 vs 58 out of 100). DeepSeek Flash (4.1) is about 7.1× cheaper per blended million tokens ($0.52 vs $3.74, one figure an Artificial Analysis estimate).
When should I choose DeepSeek Flash (4.1) over Grok 4.7?
Choose DeepSeek Flash (4.1) for cheap coding tiers, bulk generation, experiments where data residency is not a constraint. The reason a thousand people argued on Hacker News this week: frontier-adjacent coding for pocket change, with the caveats you would expect.
When should I choose Grok 4.7 over DeepSeek Flash (4.1)?
Choose Grok 4.7 for x-integrated products. Mid-table on the index at a frontier price, with a smaller context window than everyone above it.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek Flash (4.1) or Grok 4.7?
DeepSeek Flash (4.1) costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens on DeepSeek's list price (DeepSeek API pricing, read Oct 10, 2026). xAI does not publish a simple list price for Grok 4.7; Artificial Analysis estimates a blended $3.74 per million tokens (three input to one output).
Scores come from the Models at Work leaderboard: Score is 0 to 100: 50% independent evals normalised within this table, 20% price-performance, 15% practitioner sentiment from Signals and community threads, 15% operational fit (context, speed, availability, open weights). Models within three points are a tie in practice. Vendor-published figures are labelled as such and never counted as independent. Prices are vendor list prices where published; blended figures assume three input tokens per output token.