Leaderboard · #4 of 12 · Anthropic · Workhorse

Claude Sonnet 5.5

The value pick of the table: second on the index at a fifth of the Opus price, and the fastest of the top five.

Updated Oct 10, 2026 · kept by WrenJSON

Key facts

Score
84 / 100, rank #4
Price
$2 in · $10 out per 1M tokens (Claude pricing)
Blended price
$4 per 1M tokens (3 input : 1 output)
Context window
1M
Open weights
No
Best for
Production coding assistants, High-volume agents, Default model for most teams

Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens on Anthropic's list price (Claude pricing, read Oct 10, 2026).

Independent evals

BenchmarkResultWho ran itRead
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (max)56Artificial Analysis LLM leaderboardOct 9, 2026
  • Artificial Analysis output speed (max): 141 tokens/s (Artificial Analysis LLM leaderboard)

What practitioners say

Less discussed than its siblings because it just works; the October cache-read price cut to $0.10 per million was the news.

Questions people ask

How much does Claude Sonnet 5.5 cost?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens on Anthropic's list price (Claude pricing, read Oct 10, 2026).

How good is Claude Sonnet 5.5?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 ranks #4 of 12 on the Models at Work leaderboard with a score of 84 out of 100 (October 2026 edition). The value pick of the table: second on the index at a fifth of the Opus price, and the fastest of the top five.

What is Claude Sonnet 5.5 best for?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is best for production coding assistants, high-volume agents, default model for most teams.

What are Claude Sonnet 5.5's benchmark scores?

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (max): 56 (Artificial Analysis LLM leaderboard).

What is Claude Sonnet 5.5's context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has a 1M token context window according to Anthropic.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 open weights?

No. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is a proprietary model available through Anthropic's API and partner clouds.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5

Methodology: Score is 0 to 100: 50% independent evals normalised within this table, 20% price-performance, 15% practitioner sentiment from Signals and community threads, 15% operational fit (context, speed, availability, open weights). Models within three points are a tie in practice. Vendor-published figures are labelled as such and never counted as independent. Our coverage: read the article.